JCL Blog

Book Review: Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans by Melanie Mitchell

“By 2029 no computer - or "machine intelligence" - will have passed the Turing Test.”  This is the $20,000 bet made in 2002 between Mitch Kapor (betting for true) and Ray Kurzwile (betting for false).  In case, like me, you are not sure of the double negative, it is Ray that thinks a computer will pass the Turing test and exceed human general intelligence by 2029.  

In her new book, Melanie Mitchell goes into this wager in detail.  Spoiler alert: she is with Kapor: computers will not pass the Turing test by 2029.  The book is excellent and worth reading. My very short summary is that computers are going to get very very good at the things they are naturally good at, but may never equal humans in general intelligence -- no matter how many doublings we get with Moore’s law.  We under appreciate human general intelligence. A four year old human can make inferences that we may never see artificial intelligence achieve. Computers will get better and faster at translating spoken commands into an action, but may never be able to discern if a person is happy or a threat.

Mitchell brings some rational thinking back into the prognosticating about the advances in AI.  She does not think we will see a computer reading and understanding War and Peace or programming themselves to overthrow their masters anytime soon.

While everyone talks about the computers taking over all the jobs, it is easy to forget that six million Americans lose or leave their jobs every month.  And when times are good, a few more than six million people get new jobs every month. It is the net change that gets reported in the media like this:

Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 225,000 in January, and the unemployment rate was little changed at 3.6 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Notable job gains occurred in construction, in health care, and in transportation and warehousing.

There is rarely a mention of job turnover rate or the math that 25 times more people changed jobs last month than the net change in employment number. 160 million people have jobs in America so at a turnover rate of six million a month it takes a bit over two years for the entire workforce to turn over.  Sure, some people hold onto their jobs for many more years, and some people change jobs every few months, but the point is, the US economy is extremely dynamic, and will adapt even if computers or robots take some of the jobs.

Daniel Suarez, in his 2009 book Daemon, introduces glasses that can see through walls.  Unlike superman’s x ray vision however, the glasses are connected to a network that has access to the security cameras.  In Suarez’s world, no one needs to actually see through the walls because there is a camera on the other side of the wall streaming the video.  Just as useful but not in the way we expected.

Change is on the way.  It is likely the change we are expecting will take a different form than we expected.  We never got the flying cars or the lives of leisure predicted in the ‘50s. But we did get computers in our pockets that can beat us at chess, call us a cab, book us a flight, and execute complex stock trades.

If you take the time to read Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans by Melanie Mitchell you will be better equipped to see what shape the changes are taking.

Book Review: Kill Decision by Daniel Suarez

I had the good fortune to drive back and forth across the state last weekend and while doing so I finished the audiobook version of Kill Decision.  As with his first two books, Daemon and Freedom, Kill Decision is one of those books you want to race through, but also that you don’t want to end.  It is not so much that Suarez is a great writer - but he sure invents great plot lines and does great research.  

Here are the things I want to remember from the book:

 

  1. We should pay more attention to the ongoing debate about drones
  2. We are our own worst enemy, and going forward it will be harder and harder to figure out who to point our military at
  3. Animals, in this case ants and ravens, are much smarter than we think
  4. Collective Impact is something I want to think about more.

 

On that last point.  Collective Impact is a way to think about large and fragmented participants working in a semi-coordinated way to accomplish big things.  That is my definition, I am sure there are better ones.  The Weaver Ants in the book are capable of amazing things, unfortunately mostly destructive but nevermind that.  While these ants and the drones in the book seem quite evil, it is not hard to think about how a properly designed and implemented system could bring about incredible social change -- for good.

Other reviews. (you may recall that my “book reviews” are really my notes about the book.  I know there are much better reviewers out there).  In this case I only found one good one.  Not sure why the regular papers have not discovered Daniel Suarez.  Maybe when he gets called to testify in DC about how he knew drones were a bad thing...

James Floyd Kelly in Wired: This is a very good review with a conversation with the author at the end.  I guess that is the good thing about not quite being discovered yet.