Search this Site
Index of Posts
37 Signals 5000 Days Project Accenture Acer ACS Adobe Advertising Airbus Al Gore Alaska Airlines All Things Digital Amazon American Express Americas Cup Amway Andrew Mason Andrew Ross Sorkin AOL Apple Apple TV Asus AT&T Atlas Shrugged Audio Books Australia Autodesk Avatar AWS Ayn Rand Bailout Bank of America Baptie Barack Obama Barak Obama BBDO Ben Horowitz BestBuy Big Data Bill Gates Blackwater Blog Box BP Brad Feld Bradley Manning Bread Clip Broadband Bruce Hiilyer Business Insider Businessweek Buzz BYOD Camile McDormand careerbuildier Caste System CEO Channel Insider Channel Marketing Charlie Rose Charter Schools Chase Chasing Ice China Chris Anderson Chris Jordan Chris Paine Cisco Citi Group ClaimID Clay Shirky Clive Thompson Cloud Computing Cluetrain Manifesto Cnet Cognizant Collective Impact Comcast Comdex Compaq CompTIA Computer Operator Consumer Electronics Context Convergence Cookies Copernic Cost CraigsList Cranky Geeks Creative Destruction CSG CyberCrime Dan Pallotta Daniel Ellsberg Daniel Suarez Danny Sullivan Darren Huston Data Portability Dave Winer David Brooks David Carr David Engle David Letterman Deflation Dell Deloitte Delta Airlines DemandProgress.org Diaspora Dick Leon Digg Direct TV Disney Dr. Kent M. Keith Dreamworks Droid X Dropbox EarthPoint Ebay Economic Development Economies of Scale Economist Ed Snowden Edie Harding EDS Education Edwin Land Electronic Frontier Foundation Elon Musk email Emerald City Rotary Employment Security Department Enterprise Eric Schmidt Ericsson Escape from Las Vegas Euro RSCG Evan Williams Events Evernote Everything Channel Expedia Extreme Ice Survey FAA Facebook Fall of Giants Fax Machine FCC Felix Salmon FFacebook First Look Media Food Inc Ford Foreign Affairs Fortune Fox News Fred Wilson Free Future in Review Game Change Gartner Gas Prices Gatekeeper Gates GBill Gates GDP GE General Electric George Lucas George Soros Glenn Grenwald Gnip GoDaddy Goldman Sachs Google Google App Engine Google Fiber Google Maps Google+ Gordon Moore Government Groupon Gutenberg Halperin Hank Paulson Happiness Harvey Mackay Healthcare Heilemann Hemingway Hollywood Horsemen Hotels.com Hotmail HP HTC I-1240 IBM IEX Immigration Inc. Magazine India inflation Ingram Micro Instagram Insurance Intel Internet of Things Internet Week Intuit IOR iPad iPhone iPod Touch IQPC Ira Glass Iraq iTunes Jack Doresy Jajah James Balog Jaron Lanier Jason Fried Jay C Leon Jay Rosen JC Penney Jeep Jeff Bezos Jeff Jarvis Jeff Orlowski Jeffrey Katzenberg Jen Mueller Jimmy Wales John Dvorak John Edwards John Henry Brown John Mayer John Naughton Johnny Depp Julian Assange Kayak.com Keith Richards Ken Follett Kevin Turner KickStarter Kinect KIPP Kiva KPI Labor Unions Lance Armstrong Larry McMurtry Leadership League of Education Voters Lehman Brothers Lenovo Leo Laporte LeWeb LG Lists Liu Xaiobo Live Lloyd Blankfein Louie Psihoyos Loyalty Programs LTE MacBook Air MagnaGlobal Malcolm Gladwell Malcom McLean Marc Levinson March Madness Marissa Mayer Mark Hurd Mark Zuckerberg MarketWatch Matt Cutts Matt Flannery McAfee McDonalds Measurements Michael Lewis Michael Mandelbaum Michael Moore Microsoft Midway Film MIT Mitt Romney MMicrosoft MMidway Film Monaco Media Forum Moneyball Mortgage Motorola Movember MS Azure Natural Monopoly NBC NCAA Tournament Neal Stephenson Neel Kashkari Neil Barofsky Nest Net Neutrality Netflix Network Effect New Trade Routes New York City New York Times Nobel Prize North Korea Novell NY Review of Books NY Times NYSE Office 365 Ogilvy and Mather Om Malik On The Media One Question Open Book OpenGarden OpenStack OpenWireless Optimist Creed Oracle Osama bin Laden Outcome Outlook 2010 Panasonic Pareto Paul Krugman Paul Simon PBS PC Magazine Perot Systems Peter Byck Pew Pharmaceutical; Military; Wall Street Philippines Phone.com Photo Sharing Picasa Pierre Omidyar Piracy Podcasts Polaroid Predictions Priceline Privacy ProPublica Public Speaking Quality Quants Race to the Top Rackspace Rahm Emanuel Ray Ozzie Rebooting the News RetroDex Ric Merrifield Richard Stevenson RingCentral RingRevenue Robert Rubin Robert Scoble Rogers Russel Wilson Sailing Sale Sales Process Engineering Salesforce.com Sam Palmisano Samsung SAP Sarah Palin Satya Nadella Savings Rate scams Schumpeter Scientific Method Scott Patterson Seahawks Search Sears Sebastian Rupley SEC Security Self Organizing Sharepoint ShowNotes Shutterfly Signage Simon Sinek Siri Skype Slate Small Business Server SMB SMB Nation Smothers Brothers Soccer Social Media Socialtext Solomon Brothers South Korea Spray and Pray Squarespace SSteve Jobs Stand for Children Starbucks Steve Ballmer Steve Jobs StreamInsight Superbowl Supreme Court Surface SVP SVPi SWOT SXSW Sync Synnex Tasar Tech Data TechCrunch techflash TED Telephone Tesla The Advertising Show The Big Short The Box The Gates Foundation The Guardian This American Life Thomas Friedman Time Timothy Geithner Tina Fey Tony Fadell Toshiba Trade Deficit Transparency Trends Trust TSA Tungle.me Twilio Twin Towers TWIT Twitter U of W Umair Hague Uncanny Valley Unemployment UPCon2010 US Bank Vacation Value Vendor Relationship Management Verizon Vic Maui Video Conference Virtualization VMware Vodburner voicemail VolvoOceanRace Waiting for Superman Wall Street Wall Street Journal Walmart Walter Isaacson Warren Buffet Washington State Waste Wave Systems WIFI WikiLeaks Wikipedia Wildfire Wimbledon Windows Windows 8 Wired Won't Back Down World Cup WPC10 Writing wwpc2010 X1 Xbox 360 Xerox Yahoo Zappos.com Zillow Zynga
Search This Site

My Other Links
Sites I Like
Index of Posts

Entries in Goldman Sachs (11)

Wednesday
Apr092014

Goldman Sachs Looks Funny in a White Hat

Today in the Wall Street Journal, Goldman Sachs calls for more regulation and says everyone should support IEX, the new exchange started by Brad Katsuyama and featured in Flash Boys by Michael Lewis.

The article references in internal email that says:

"While we think that a regulatory response may be needed to address these market structure issues, it would be best for the overall market if IEX achieved critical mass, even if that results in reduced volumes in our US dark pool, Sigma X."

It took forever, but it finally happend.  Back in 2010 I wrote this post saying that more regulation would not happen on Wall Street until the Wall Street guys decided it would be good for them.  At the time I thought that they would want it because individual investors would be leaving the market.  Any maybe that is why they are calling for it now.

Another potential motivation comes out in Flash Boys however.  Goldman Sachs is way behind the other high frequency traders.  This could be because they cannot get or keep good programming tallent -- because they got the FBI to jail one former employee.  They also show their neaderthal tendencies when they refuse to participate in the open source community and proclaim all open source code to be proprietary to them.  So they were losing to the other scammers -- what a perfect time to call for more regulation.

Wednesday
Aug082012

Still No Reason for Wall Street to Change

I suppose I should not be surprised that five years into the financial crisis that nothing has really changed in the way that the financial markets work.  Either way it is disappointing that our economic system, arguably the most adaptable, has not adapted.  The explanation: no change will come until it is really needed (forced on us).

Yesterday, Andrew Ross Sorkin posted this piece on why individual investors are fleeing equities.  I should say still fleeing, because individual investors have been leaving the market this entire time.  Here is a post I wrote on the subject in May 2010.

My thought then was that Goldman Sachs and the other market manipulators would eventually want real regulation because they would need it to get customers to come back.  Imagine if we had as little confidence in the FAA as we do in the SEC -- Amtrack might have a viable business!

It now seems like such a polylanna-ish thought that we would ever be able to overcome the influence of Goldman Sachs and the other insiders.  

Our real "problem" is that the rest of the world is in worse shape than we are, and everyone wants to park their cash in the US.  So in the end we only have to be less corrupt than the alternatives to avoid making changes.

Friday
Nov252011

Book Review: Boomerang by Michael Lewis

Michael Lewis is one of my favorite authors. His magic is the ability to rapidly become an insider on a subject, without losing the perspective of an outsider.  He is an Earthling that sees the world through the eyes of a Martian.  Or a bond trader that sees Wall Street through the eyes of main street.  His latest work, Boomerang, takes us on a tour of what he is calling the new third world.  This is great irony capitalizing on the recent fashion of using the term “developing nation” instead of the term “third world”.  It is no longer correct to count the worlds.  Counting or not, we have leap frogged in the backward direction - over the developing nations.  His tour of countries worse off than the third world starts in Iceland, and goes to Ireland, Greece, Spain, Germany, and well, California. 

The recurring theme is examining what people do when told they are in a room full of money and:  “The lights are out, you can do whatever you want to do and no one will ever know.” It’s a great mental picture that takes all of a half second to absorb.  Lewis makes it even more powerful by applying it to nations.  “Americans wanted to own homes far larger than they could afford, and to allow the strong to exploit the weak. Icelanders wanted to stop fishing and become investment bankers, and to allow their alpha males to reveal a theretofore suppressed megalomania. The Germans wanted to be even more German; the Irish wanted to stop being Irish…”

The section on Germany was particularly interesting as Lewis investigated that culture’s fascination with human waste, which made them particularly vulnerable to the toxic waste products being packaged by our people on Wall Street.  It will be a long time before anybody anywhere in the world ever trusts Americans again.  WMD + Abu Ghraib + Goldman Sachs = Americans are liars. Our reputation could not be repaired even if we had the money to do another Marshall Plan.  Looks like we are going to be sewing Canadian flags on our backpacks for many years to come.

There have been many great reviews of the book.  Here are links to a few of them:

NY Times:

The Guardian:  

Forbes

Washington Post

Seeking Alpha:  

As I do with many books, I listened to this one on Audible.  It was another great production, this time read by Dylan Baker.

Friday
Jan142011

Facebook's Deal with the Devil

The Economist last week recalled a vivid description by Rolling Stone of Goldman Sachs:  "a great vampire squid" that likes to stick its "blood funnel" into anything that can make it money.  So given all of the advantages that Facebook has, why would a smart guy like Mark Zuckerberg subject himself to a bleeding by the many tentacled machine of Wall Street?  

Maybe Zuckerberg knows that there are bad guys in the world and bringing in the firm that is the best at aggressively pursuing its own self interest will equip Facebook to fend off the other bad guys.  In essence, a deal with the devil.  Who are the these bad guys?  One of Facebook's biggest shareholders is Digital Sky Technologies (DST), the firm of Alisher Usmanov, a Russian oligarch with ties to Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev.  Even executives with ten times Zuckerberg's experience would be worried when considering how to control DST.  With Goldman at the table could the dynamics of the relationship between Zuck and the Russians be improved?

If that is not enough incentive, there could be a bigger one right here in the USA.  Goldman Sachs may be good at the things it talks about on its web site, but they really shine when it comes to manipulating our government.  And Facebook needs all the help they can get controlling the US government. Twitter disclosed last week that the government had requested access to data on Julian Assange and people associated with him.  To Twitter's credit they chose to disclose this request to the public.  We can be sure that similar letters were sent to Facebook, Google, and other service providers.  But we did not hear a word about those.

It is a little spooky thinking about government agencies combing through Facebook data, but we can be pretty sure that Facebook's nearly 600 million users, their relationships with other users, and all of the interactions between them must be irresistible to our many law enforcement and counter terrorism groups.   I know that if I had to figure out how to deal with the FBI or CIA, not to mention the SEC,  having Goldman's muscle to back me up would be quite welcome.  

Could Blackwater or Halliburton be next?

 

Friday
Dec312010

Post 272

Well it has been a year and this is my 272nd post.  I set out to write a blog entry every day and even though I came up a few short, I have enjoyed organizing my thoughts and working on my writing in 2010.  

Thinking about why I do what I do, or what I plan to do in the future is unavoidable (for me anyway) as the calendar changes to a new year.  The blog posts I wrote this year were adequate notes to myself about what I was thinking at the time, and the fact that 4,000 other people found my posts interesting enough to read is flattering.  

So what to do in 2011?  I have no plans to become a journalist, so I am not looking for a scoop or to break a story.  I do think I could put more effort into some bigger writing pieces that further organize my thinking into actual arguments.  So in the weeks ahead I am going to pick a few main themes and start to develop them into longer essays that argue a particular point.

Here are some possible subjects based on the number of entries I made this year organized into broad categories:

Tech Marketing (113 entries):  I write a lot about this because my company helps large tech companies with sales and marketing.  I think the changing role of the salesperson is worth spending time thinking about with Google and Facebook on one end of the spectrum because they really have no salespeople, and Salesforce.com on the other end spending 50% of revenue on salespeople.  I don't know how this is going to work out but it sure will be interesting to watch.

New Media (51 entries):  My second most written about topic is new media.  To me New Media is the decline of the newspaper, publishing, and TV we grew up with and the rise of blogging, micro blogging, social media, and streaming media over the Internet.  We live in a very interesting time and the creative destruction of this sector is one of the things that makes it so interesting.

Politics (47 entries):  Next in line is politics - mostly in the US, but invariably overlapping with the rise of China as a world power.  The big question of course is whether or not the US will stay on top and how many wars will we start as we struggle with our identity.

Economics (44 entries): Finally economics.   In the world I want to live in, those that create the most value get the most rewards.  It does not take long to see that right now getting rewarded is often disconnected from value creation.  Will my pollyannaish view of the world find its way into reality, or will Goldman Sachs continue to gobble up everything for themselves?

There is one other subject that I find very interesting and that weaves throughout all of this: demographics.  We often define people in groups and evaluate the relationships between the groups based on our understanding of the average within that group.  This tendency prevents us from seeing the real picture.  The growth rate of a nation's GDP or even the GDP per capita does not tell us very much.  The unemployment rate in the US is around 10% -- but some sectors cannot find enough workers and others have 25% unemployment.  If you are interested in this subject, read this from Foreign Affairs.  Sure there are well over a billion people in China, but half of them are subsistence farmers who do not participate in the economy.  

I am looking forward to digging in on these topics during 2011.  As always, your comments and thoughts are appreciated.

Monday
May172010

Physics, Nature, and the Rule of the Mob

Life is governed by the laws of physics, the laws of nature, and the rule of the mob.  Physics is "what goes up must come down". I don't know what the laws of nature are, but we say they have been violated when we see something really disturbing, so I am sure they are useful. And the rule of the mob is about to take down two companies we thought were invincible just a few months ago:  Goldman Sachs and Facebook.

There are undoubtedly books on the rule of the mob and I have not read any of them.  My description goes like this:  when a person or an organization gets to the top of the heap, it has to spend so much energy just staying at the top of the heap, that it cannot stay on the top of the heap any longer.  The timing of the process is highly variable, but the faster one gets to the top of the heap the more likely the mob will vigorously pursue a change in the hierarchy.  

Goldman Sachs got there slowly and stayed at the top for a very long time.  Most of us cannot even remember a time that Goldman was not at the top.  SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro was quoted in the Wall Street Journal on Saturday saying "If we don't get serious about this process, we may cease to exist." Goldman may own parts of the government, but this kind of resolve will be hard to overcome.  Who would you pick for longevity, the SEC or Goldman Sachs.  I go with the SEC.

Facebook blew past 300 million users to its current 500 million or so and its founder has turned down hundreds of millions of dollars to keep running it.  The tide is turning however and it is now cooler to quit Facebook than to use it.  The tech community turned against Facebook several weeks ago, and the rest of the mob will likely defect in the weeks ahead.  In fact there is a web site dedicated to this movement called Quit Facebook Day.

One interesting element to these actions by the mob is the lack of viable alternatives.  Goldman Sachs is probably not any more evil than any of the other firms on Wall Street.  Their unique crime is that they are just so good at taking their client's money.  Clearly market demand for a system we can use to organize our relationships on the web has driven Facebook to its current heights.  No clear successor has presented itself, although the mob is putting some weight behind the Diaspora Project, but four kids with an idea does not a viable alternative make.

If you are Mark Zuckerberg, or Lloyd Blankfein, you can be comforted to know that the crowd will only take you down a few notches and probably not out of the picture all together.  After all, your predecessors put you in good company.  Firms like Standard Oil, IBM, and Microsoft all fell victim to the mob.

Funny, my spell checker wants to replace "Zuckerberg" with "Boodsucker" -- even spellcheck has turned against him!

-image courtesy of www.thefirstreporter.com

 LATER:  NYT post from Friday about how the Web itself is a social network.

 

Monday
May032010

The FAA, SEC, and You

We fly because of the FAA is doing its job. The FAA exists because the airlines want it to.  We invest on Wall Street even though we know the SEC is not doing it's job.  Besides proof that greed is more powerful than fear as a motivator in the financial markets, and visa versa for travelers, this shows us that until the financial firms want to be regulated (and call off their dogs in DC), there will be no meaningful financial regulation.

There are a few simple things that the individual investor can do to influence this situation:

 

  1. Sell your stocks
  2. Influence the institutions (it worked with divestiture from South Africa) 
  3. Tell everyone why you are doing it.

 

Once such an exit from the markets gets going, others will follow if for no other reason than self preservation.  Which will drive the markets down further.

Once wall street realizes they need regulation to rebuild trust in the markets, then financial reforms will come easily.

The first to advocate for regulation will be the honest firms -- after all, the guys who were maintaining their airplanes before the FAA had to pick between skimping on maintenance (to be competitive) or advocating for regulation to make the other guys maintain their planes.  I don't see any financial firms advocating for regulation yet -- so maybe none of them are honest!

What to do with your money if you take it out of the market?  Check out my recommended portfolio allocation here.

Sunday
May022010

Beware of the Drowning Golden Socks

Anyone who has been through lifesaving class knows that a drowning person, in an effort of self preservation, will try to save himself by pushing you under.  Goldman Sachs could be drowning and we should be on the lookout for GS to try to save itself by grabbing anyone nearby.  We saw the first evidence of this last week when an attempt was made to implicate Warren Buffet.  Anyone in finance faced with drowning would pick Buffet as a good place to find some buoyancy.

Deflecting to the system is another defense that Goldman is almost certain to invoke.  So watch for the everyone was doing it/ if you arrest us you have to arrest everyone defense.

We should expect this same dynamic to play out in other areas where titans are threatened.  After all, the mightiest do the most amazing things to hang on to their power, and the most desperate things on the way down.

I would also put Facebook, Google, Apple, and maybe even China in the category of titans. 

 

Saturday
Apr102010

Robert Rubin is No Boyscout

Former treasury secretary Robert Rubin had to pick between admitting incompetence or confessing to corruption this week and instead he declared that knowing Citi Group was out on a dangerous ledge was not his job. Since he was paid 100 million dollars to advise Citi on something, and since he was at one time the CEO of Goldman Sachs (who invented the complex instruments that caused the crash), what was his job? 

 

The only explanation is that Citi was buying inside access to Washington from Rubin - not his wall street expertise.  So this week Robert Rubin was telling the world that his job was to ensure that Citi was not regulated.  So I believe him when he says it was not his job to know what was on the balance sheet -- it was his job to make sure no one in the government knew either.

Here is a piece from November 2007 with some of the details about the things Rubin was not watching.

Here is a piece from October 2008 where the NY Times looks into the work Rubin did with Alan Greenspan to discredit Brooksley Born, who at the time was running the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and who was advocating greater regulation of derivatives.

We ended up giving Citigroup 45 billion dollars -- so Rubin earned his pay.  He got each citizen of our country to give Citigroup $150 in bail out money.  His next trick?  Maybe his job now is to figure out how not to pay it back!  

 

Tuesday
Mar232010

Book Review: The Big Short by Michael Lewis

Michael Lewis just put out another book about Wall Street - the topic that originally made him famous when he wrote Liars Poker in the '80s.  Readers of this blog know that I am already a fan (see Moneyball and The Home Game) and The Big Short does not disappoint.  

Knowing that I am not going to get another new work by this author for a year or so, I did my best to pace myself, but it was hopeless and three days later I was done.  Even though I am familiar with the story (see Too Big to Fail) I was not tempted even once to skim.

In a strange way the book restored some of my confidence in our free market system because the people that the author chooses to follow in the book are small time outsiders who were able to figure out very early what was going to happen in the market for mortgage bonds. Simultaneously however, Lewis reinforced my view that the Wall Street game is rigged and only a fools expose their money to parasites like Goldman Sachs. 

Here are my take aways:

  1.  The people at Goldman Sachs really are the best and the brightest -- and they really are amoral.  They invented the complex instruments that caused the problem, made the fees, and promptly offloaded the risks to others -- like AIG.  They did their very best to conceal the truth by influencing everyone from the ratings agencies to the government -- which permitted the problem to get very big before it blew up.  I can't help but wonder how many other times the economy got wobbly and was prevented from behaving like a self correcting rational market because Goldman and others like them were madly pulling all of the levers to maximize their winnings.
  2. Our government has no idea what to do about it.  Clearly the regulators are being deceived and worse yet they don't know it.  They were nowhere to be found while Bear Stearns, Lehman Bros, AIG, and others were placing gargantuan bets with other people's money and, amazingly, enough of their own money to blow themselves up.  When it came time to assess the situation and decide about TARP there was not a single government official that really knew what was going on.
  3. The author makes an effort to get to a root cause and drills to the Solomon Brothers conversion from a private company to a public company and therefore shifting the risk of their activities away from themselves and to their shareholders.  Everyone of John Gutfreund's peers considered it a betrayal at the time, but they all eventually followed suit.  Once they had suckered others to bear the risk -- they cranked the compensation models in their own favor and the RTC/Junk Bond blow up, the Long Term Capital Management blow up, the latest melt down, and the next catastrophe were set in motion.

That is right, we have not fixed a thing and just as the insiders are on their way to their next really big payday, the rest of the country is on its way to another "surprise" on Wall Street.  If you have a hard time believing this, check out this article in the Guardian about David Tepper.  Tepper decided he was not being fairly compensated at Goldman Sachs -- so he started Appaloosa Management that bet big on the government bailout of the banks.  His fund is up $4.5 billion and he gets $2.5 billion of it.  I wonder what is going to happen when the size of the problems created on Wall Street exceeds the financial capacity of our government to pay the bill.  Will we call that financial armageddon?

Here are some other reviews:

The New York Times

The Washington Post

Reuters

Here is a link to get the book on Amazon.com.