Search this Site
Index of Posts
37 Signals Accenture Acer ACS Adobe Advertising Airbus Al Gore Alaska Airlines All Things Digital Amazon Americas Cup Amway Andrew Mason AOL Apple Asus Audio Books Australia Autodesk Avatar AWS Bank of America Baptie Barack Obama Ben Horowitz BestBuy Bill Gates Blackwater Blog Brad Feld Bradley Manning Broadband Business Insider Businessweek Buzz Caste System CEO Channel Insider Channel Marketing Charlie Rose Chase China Chris Anderson Cisco Citi Group ClaimID Clay Shirky Clive Thompson Cloud Computing Cnet Comcast Comdex Compaq CompTIA Computer Operator Consumer Electronics Context Convergence Copernic Cost CraigsList Cranky Geeks Creative Destruction CSG CyberCrime Daniel Ellsberg Danny Sullivan Darren Huston Data Portability Dave Winer David Brooks David Letterman Deflation Dell Deloitte Delta Airlines DemandProgress.org Diaspora Digg Direct TV Disney Droid X Dropbox EarthPoint Ebay Economic Development Economies of Scale Economist EDS Edwin Land email Emerald City Rotary Enterprise Eric Schmidt Ericsson Escape from Las Vegas Euro RSCG Events Evernote Everything Channel Expedia FAA Facebook Fall of Giants Fax Machine FCC FFacebook Ford Foreign Affairs Fortune Fox News Fred Wilson Free Future in Review Game Change Gartner Gas Prices Gatekeeper Gates GBill Gates GDP GE General Electric George Lucas Gnip GoDaddy Goldman Sachs Google Google App Engine Google Maps Google+ Government Groupon Halperin Happiness Harvey Mackay Healthcare Heilemann Hemingway Hollywood Horsemen Hotels.com Hotmail HP HTC IBM Immigration India inflation Ingram Micro Instagram Intel Internet Week Intuit IOR iPad iPhone iPod Touch IQPC Ira Glass Iraq iTunes Jajah Jaron Lanier Jason Fried Jay C Leon Jay Rosen JC Penney Jeep Jeff Jarvis Jimmy Wales John Dvorak John Edwards John Mayer Johnny Depp Julian Assange Kayak.com Keith Richards Ken Follett Kevin Turner Kinect KIPP KPI Labor Unions Larry McMurtry Leadership League of Education Voters Lehman Brothers Lenovo Leo Laporte LeWeb LG Lists Liu Xaiobo Live Loyalty Programs LTE Malcolm Gladwell Malcom McLean Marc Levinson March Madness Maris Pearl Mark Hurd Mark Zuckerberg MarketWatch Matt Cutts McAfee McDonalds Measurements Michael Lewis Michael Mandelbaum Michael Moore Microsoft MMicrosoft Monaco Media Forum Moneyball Mortgage Motorola Movember MS Azure Natural Monopoly NCAA Tournament Neal Stephenson Net Neutrality Netflix Network Effect New Trade Routes New York City New York Times Nobel Prize North Korea Novell NY Review of Books NY Times NYSE Office 365 Om Malik On The Media One Question Open Book OpenStack Oracle Osama bin Laden Outcome Outlook 2010 Panasonic Pareto Paul Krugman PBS PC Magazine Perot Systems Pew Pharmaceutical; Military; Wall Street Philippines Phone.com Photo Sharing Picasa Piracy Podcasts Polaroid Predictions Priceline Privacy ProPublica Public Speaking Quality Quants Race to the Top Rahm Emanuel Ray Ozzie Rebooting the News RetroDex Ric Merrifield RingRevenue Robert Rubin Robert Scoble Sailing Sales Process Engineering Salesforce.com Sam Palmisano SAP Sarah Palin Savings Rate Schumpeter Scientific Method Scott Patterson Search Sears Sebastian Rupley SEC Security Sharepoint ShowNotes Shutterfly Signage Simon Sinek Siri Skype Small Business Server SMB SMB Nation Smothers Brothers Soccer Social Media Socialtext South Korea Spray and Pray Squarespace Stand for Children Starbucks Steve Ballmer Steve Jobs Superbowl SWOT SXSW Synnex Tech Data TechCrunch techflash TED Telephone Tesla The Advertising Show The Big Short The Box This American Life Thomas Friedman Time Tina Fey Toshiba Trade Deficit Transparency Trends Trust TSA Tungle.me Twilio Twin Towers TWIT Twitter U of W Umair Hague Uncanny Valley Unemployment UPCon2010 US Bank Vacation Value Vic Maui Video Conference Virtualization VMware Vodburner voicemail Waiting for Superman Wall Street Wall Street Journal Walmart Walter Isaacson Washington State Waste Wave Systems WIFI WikiLeaks Wikipedia Wildfire Wimbledon Wired World Cup WPC10 Writing wwpc2010 X1 Xbox 360 Xerox Zappos.com Zillow Zynga
Search This Site

My Other Links
Sites I Like
Index of Posts
« The Phone is Dead... Again | Main | On the Origin of Marketing Initiatives by Budget Allocation »
Thursday
Mar312011

The New Microsoft

The departures at Microsoft have hit a point where local journalists are starting to produce lists.  Nick Eaton at the PI has this great list with dozens of links, and Sharon Pian Chan at the Times has another one here.  Whether or not there is a wizard behind the curtain with some kind of a grand plan, change is on its way.  This kind of turnover guarantees that a new Microsoft is being formed.  A company with 90,000 employees will never be a blank canvas, but new ideas must be working their way into places that have not seen new ideas for a while.

Into this mix we add Paul Allen with his memoir out this week and a less than flattering account of early scheming by Bill Gates.  This will keep Microsoft in the news for a while and start a whole new avalanche of What Microsoft Should Do articles.  This does not take much prodding however.  People have been telling Microsoft what to do for so long that advice sounds like the din of the cars going by on HWY 520.  People suggest that they bring back Bill Gates, fire Ballmer, and ask if Microsoft is still relevant so often that if you want to make a suggestion, just get in line.

In an attempt to avoid adding to the cast of advice noisemakers, I am going to make a prediction or three about Microsoft’s future.  Sure you could say that these predictions are thinly veiled suggestions – after all, the answers on Jeopardy are really the questions.  Either way here are three thoughts.

The Enterprise

Some think this is the name of the ship on Star Trek, but that would be the “Starship Enterprise”.  Others may think of the first nuclear powered aircraft carrier, but that would be the “USS Enterprise”.  Those of us in technology marketing think of the Enterprise as bigger businesses who still control 72% of all technology spending.  A very large part of that spending still goes to Microsoft.  Microsoft knows the Enterprise and even without much innovation - it will take decades to blow that lead.  They cannot coast forever, but I think it is a lot like the USS Enterprise which has to refuel its reactors every 20 years.

Partners

Most of Microsoft’s success in the Enterprise is a result of its ability to sell through channel partners.  No one has the partner reach that Microsoft has with its over 600,000 channel partners.  These companies, ranging from big consultancies like Accenture to Joe’s Computers next door, make their living selling Microsoft’s products and the services required to keep them going.  Salesforce.com has been spending 50% of its revenue for ten years trying to make a dent in Microsoft’s dominance in this area.  Admittedly Salesforce.com’s $1 billion in revenue is a dent.  But as soon as Salesforce.com stops spending over $700 million in sales and marketing every year – then what?

Security

Microsoft knows more about security than anyone.  Microsoft has legions of very smart people evaluating and responding to attacks on Windows and releasing patches every week.  Right now consumers willingly trade their privacy for “free” services.  Consumers don’t care if Google reads their emails and Facebook analyzes their relationships because there has not been security Pearl Harbor yet.  It is coming and when it does, consumers may reconsider.  The galvanizing event does not have to be a municipal power grid take over by terrorists.  It could easily be convictions for treason based on private emails and Facebook updates that consumers thought they deleted, but lived on in the cloud and were accessed by law enforcement and a Committee Against Un-American Activities.  Sound crazy? What about kidnappers, bounty hunters, stalkers, or even paparazzi accessing mobile carrier databases and hunting people by electronic data trail?

Change is on its way at Microsoft and I think many people are going to be surprised.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

Having worked for Microsoft (as incentive/loyalty strategy vendor) for the last 10 years, I wholeheartedly agree with you that a new Microsoft is being formed. Moreover, major changes in the way they used to fund “entrepreneurship” within their management ranks supports your view on the new MS. Change is good and for a mammoth size business, should be a constant. Let’s hope that at the end (or the middle) we are positively surprised…@chanstrategist

March 31, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterClaudio Ayub

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>