Search this Site
Index of Posts
37 Signals Accenture Acer ACS Adobe Advertising Airbus Al Gore Alaska Airlines All Things Digital Amazon Americas Cup Amway Andrew Mason AOL Apple Asus Audio Books Australia Autodesk Avatar AWS Bank of America Baptie Barack Obama Ben Horowitz BestBuy Bill Gates Blackwater Blog Brad Feld Bradley Manning Broadband Business Insider Businessweek Buzz Caste System CEO Channel Insider Channel Marketing Charlie Rose Chase China Chris Anderson Cisco Citi Group ClaimID Clay Shirky Clive Thompson Cloud Computing Cnet Comcast Comdex Compaq CompTIA Computer Operator Consumer Electronics Context Convergence Copernic Cost CraigsList Cranky Geeks Creative Destruction CSG CyberCrime Daniel Ellsberg Danny Sullivan Darren Huston Data Portability Dave Winer David Brooks David Letterman Deflation Dell Deloitte Delta Airlines DemandProgress.org Diaspora Digg Direct TV Disney Droid X Dropbox EarthPoint Ebay Economic Development Economies of Scale Economist EDS Edwin Land email Emerald City Rotary Enterprise Eric Schmidt Ericsson Escape from Las Vegas Euro RSCG Events Evernote Everything Channel Expedia FAA Facebook Fall of Giants Fax Machine FCC FFacebook Ford Foreign Affairs Fortune Fox News Fred Wilson Free Future in Review Game Change Gartner Gas Prices Gatekeeper Gates GBill Gates GDP GE General Electric George Lucas Gnip GoDaddy Goldman Sachs Google Google App Engine Google Maps Google+ Government Groupon Halperin Happiness Harvey Mackay Healthcare Heilemann Hemingway Hollywood Horsemen Hotels.com Hotmail HP HTC IBM Immigration India inflation Ingram Micro Instagram Intel Internet Week Intuit IOR iPad iPhone iPod Touch IQPC Ira Glass Iraq iTunes Jajah Jaron Lanier Jason Fried Jay C Leon Jay Rosen JC Penney Jeep Jeff Jarvis Jimmy Wales John Dvorak John Edwards John Mayer Johnny Depp Julian Assange Kayak.com Keith Richards Ken Follett Kevin Turner Kinect KIPP KPI Labor Unions Larry McMurtry Leadership League of Education Voters Lehman Brothers Lenovo Leo Laporte LeWeb LG Lists Liu Xaiobo Live Loyalty Programs LTE Malcolm Gladwell Malcom McLean Marc Levinson March Madness Maris Pearl Mark Hurd Mark Zuckerberg MarketWatch Matt Cutts McAfee McDonalds Measurements Michael Lewis Michael Mandelbaum Michael Moore Microsoft MMicrosoft Monaco Media Forum Moneyball Mortgage Motorola Movember MS Azure Natural Monopoly NCAA Tournament Neal Stephenson Net Neutrality Netflix Network Effect New Trade Routes New York City New York Times Nobel Prize North Korea Novell NY Review of Books NY Times NYSE Office 365 Om Malik On The Media One Question Open Book OpenStack Oracle Osama bin Laden Outcome Outlook 2010 Panasonic Pareto Paul Krugman PBS PC Magazine Perot Systems Pew Pharmaceutical; Military; Wall Street Philippines Phone.com Photo Sharing Picasa Piracy Podcasts Polaroid Predictions Priceline Privacy ProPublica Public Speaking Quality Quants Race to the Top Rahm Emanuel Ray Ozzie Rebooting the News RetroDex Ric Merrifield RingRevenue Robert Rubin Robert Scoble Sailing Sales Process Engineering Salesforce.com Sam Palmisano SAP Sarah Palin Savings Rate Schumpeter Scientific Method Scott Patterson Search Sears Sebastian Rupley SEC Security Sharepoint ShowNotes Shutterfly Signage Simon Sinek Siri Skype Small Business Server SMB SMB Nation Smothers Brothers Soccer Social Media Socialtext South Korea Spray and Pray Squarespace Stand for Children Starbucks Steve Ballmer Steve Jobs Superbowl SWOT SXSW Synnex Tech Data TechCrunch techflash TED Telephone Tesla The Advertising Show The Big Short The Box This American Life Thomas Friedman Time Tina Fey Toshiba Trade Deficit Transparency Trends Trust TSA Tungle.me Twilio Twin Towers TWIT Twitter U of W Umair Hague Uncanny Valley Unemployment UPCon2010 US Bank Vacation Value Vic Maui Video Conference Virtualization VMware Vodburner voicemail Waiting for Superman Wall Street Wall Street Journal Walmart Walter Isaacson Washington State Waste Wave Systems WIFI WikiLeaks Wikipedia Wildfire Wimbledon Wired World Cup WPC10 Writing wwpc2010 X1 Xbox 360 Xerox Zappos.com Zillow Zynga
Search This Site

My Other Links
Sites I Like
Index of Posts
« Book Review: Googled by Ken Auletta | Main | Predictions »
Wednesday
Jan062010

Do We Want China to Fail?

In the past 30 years the Chinese economic miracle has raised 500 million people from below the poverty line to above it. Our economy is stuck in the mud and theirs is seemingly growing at whatever number they want. There is a very good article in the New York Times outlining how China's growing economy is impacting its domestic markets. The article states that the average annual income in the cities in China is still under $3,000, and under $1,000 in the rural areas. Despite this, the Chinese now buy more cars, more home appliances and bigger TVs than we do here in the US.

The China story is truly amazing -- after all, they have not had a losing year since 1976 and in those three decades, only two years had GDP growth of under 5%. In 1976 China's economy was 5% the size of ours, now it is 50%. Economists may have differing opinions on many things, but they all agree that markets have cycles. Thirty years without an economic reset in China does imply that one of these days, their economy is going to have a bad patch. When it happens, we will be able to say that even the Chinese markets reset every once in a while, and some people will feel better about themselves. I would argue that it is not in our best interest for the following three reasons:

Life or Death

The delicate balance of the Chinese economy still has more than 600 million people living very close to starvation. China is extremely focussed on growth because without it millions of people starve. And if that is not enough motivation, with starvation comes political unrest -- so a downturn in China would also start a revolution intent on replacing the government. With the recent build up in Chinese military capability, such a change would include the current government turning on its own people -- also devastating.

Keep us Honest

Honesty is in short supply in our country these days, but it would be even less so without a strong competitor. On some days it is nice to be alone on top of the world economic heap, but I would argue that since the fall of the Berlin Wall, we have been without competition, and lack of competition gives us nothing to focus on but gaming our own system. The last twenty years has seen our smartest math and science minds put to use creating financial products on Wall Street, and engineering quadruple razor blades we will never need. A growing and vibrant China motivates us to fix our own country.

Share the Load

A successful China may not get around to helping other nations for fifty years. Just taking care of themselves however, will free the rest of the developed nations to work to solve the other terrible problems facing our world. Who knows, if China continues on its path to prosperity they may even decide they have a responsibility to help others. And we could use all of the help we can get.

So even though we may feel badly that the Chinese are now buying all of the Hummers -- hey, they even bought that company -- and soon will be buying many more of our assets, I would encourage you to join me in pulling for China to succeed. If they do we will all be better off.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>