Search this Site
Index of Posts
37 Signals Accenture Acer ACS Adobe Advertising Airbus Al Gore Alaska Airlines All Things Digital Amazon Americas Cup Amway Andrew Mason AOL Apple Asus Audio Books Australia Autodesk Avatar AWS Bank of America Baptie Barack Obama Ben Horowitz BestBuy Bill Gates Blackwater Blog Brad Feld Bradley Manning Broadband Business Insider Businessweek Buzz Caste System CEO Channel Insider Channel Marketing Charlie Rose Chase China Chris Anderson Cisco Citi Group ClaimID Clay Shirky Clive Thompson Cloud Computing Cnet Comcast Comdex Compaq CompTIA Computer Operator Consumer Electronics Context Convergence Copernic Cost CraigsList Cranky Geeks Creative Destruction CSG CyberCrime Daniel Ellsberg Danny Sullivan Darren Huston Data Portability Dave Winer David Brooks David Letterman Deflation Dell Deloitte Delta Airlines DemandProgress.org Diaspora Digg Direct TV Disney Droid X Dropbox EarthPoint Ebay Economic Development Economies of Scale Economist EDS Edwin Land email Emerald City Rotary Enterprise Eric Schmidt Ericsson Escape from Las Vegas Euro RSCG Events Evernote Everything Channel Expedia FAA Facebook Fall of Giants Fax Machine FCC FFacebook Ford Foreign Affairs Fortune Fox News Fred Wilson Free Future in Review Game Change Gartner Gas Prices Gatekeeper Gates GBill Gates GDP GE General Electric George Lucas Gnip GoDaddy Goldman Sachs Google Google App Engine Google Maps Google+ Government Groupon Halperin Happiness Harvey Mackay Healthcare Heilemann Hemingway Hollywood Horsemen Hotels.com Hotmail HP HTC IBM Immigration India inflation Ingram Micro Instagram Intel Internet Week Intuit IOR iPad iPhone iPod Touch IQPC Ira Glass Iraq iTunes Jajah Jaron Lanier Jason Fried Jay C Leon Jay Rosen JC Penney Jeep Jeff Jarvis Jimmy Wales John Dvorak John Edwards John Mayer Johnny Depp Julian Assange Kayak.com Keith Richards Ken Follett Kevin Turner Kinect KIPP KPI Labor Unions Larry McMurtry Leadership League of Education Voters Lehman Brothers Lenovo Leo Laporte LeWeb LG Lists Liu Xaiobo Live Loyalty Programs LTE Malcolm Gladwell Malcom McLean Marc Levinson March Madness Maris Pearl Mark Hurd Mark Zuckerberg MarketWatch Matt Cutts McAfee McDonalds Measurements Michael Lewis Michael Mandelbaum Michael Moore Microsoft MMicrosoft Monaco Media Forum Moneyball Mortgage Motorola Movember MS Azure Natural Monopoly NCAA Tournament Neal Stephenson Net Neutrality Netflix Network Effect New Trade Routes New York City New York Times Nobel Prize North Korea Novell NY Review of Books NY Times NYSE Office 365 Om Malik On The Media One Question Open Book OpenStack Oracle Osama bin Laden Outcome Outlook 2010 Panasonic Pareto Paul Krugman PBS PC Magazine Perot Systems Pew Pharmaceutical; Military; Wall Street Philippines Phone.com Photo Sharing Picasa Piracy Podcasts Polaroid Predictions Priceline Privacy ProPublica Public Speaking Quality Quants Race to the Top Rahm Emanuel Ray Ozzie Rebooting the News RetroDex Ric Merrifield RingRevenue Robert Rubin Robert Scoble Sailing Sales Process Engineering Salesforce.com Sam Palmisano SAP Sarah Palin Savings Rate Schumpeter Scientific Method Scott Patterson Search Sears Sebastian Rupley SEC Security Sharepoint ShowNotes Shutterfly Signage Simon Sinek Siri Skype Small Business Server SMB SMB Nation Smothers Brothers Soccer Social Media Socialtext South Korea Spray and Pray Squarespace Stand for Children Starbucks Steve Ballmer Steve Jobs Superbowl SWOT SXSW Synnex Tech Data TechCrunch techflash TED Telephone Tesla The Advertising Show The Big Short The Box This American Life Thomas Friedman Time Tina Fey Toshiba Trade Deficit Transparency Trends Trust TSA Tungle.me Twilio Twin Towers TWIT Twitter U of W Umair Hague Uncanny Valley Unemployment UPCon2010 US Bank Vacation Value Vic Maui Video Conference Virtualization VMware Vodburner voicemail Waiting for Superman Wall Street Wall Street Journal Walmart Walter Isaacson Washington State Waste Wave Systems WIFI WikiLeaks Wikipedia Wildfire Wimbledon Wired World Cup WPC10 Writing wwpc2010 X1 Xbox 360 Xerox Zappos.com Zillow Zynga
Search This Site

My Other Links
Sites I Like
Index of Posts
« Book Review: Work Hard. Be Nice. by Jay Mathews | Main | Old Channels meet New Channels »
Wednesday
Jan202010

Google is China: Only the stakes are higher for China. 

The recent tension between China and Google has focussed our attention on the contrast between these two organizations. However, anyone capable of suspending their own perspective will find some similarities too. Here are a few I can think of:

Long Term Perspective

Both organizations take the long term perspective. China is 30 years into a plan that spans a century or more and Google is a decade into theirs without any sign of letting up. Both organizations focus intently on stability in leadership, China with a one party system and carefully crafted power transitions, and Google with a two tiered corporate governance structure that insulates the leadership from typical wall street pressures.

Driven by Engineering Minds and Data Decisions

Google is famous for collecting data on everything and using it to make better decisions. They believe there is a better way to do just about everything and the new ways will be discovered by those that are willing to try new ideas and measure everything. China is a student of their own experiences and everyone else's. They know good ideas are out there and are willing to bring them home and try them out. China measures everything too.

Growth Attracts Attention and Invites Compromises

Both organizations are experiencing very rapid growth and as a result have attracted the attention of the world. Everyone else wants to be around these growing entities and are often times willing to make significant sacrifices in order to do so. Many companies have compromised their values in order to do business in China. Many have exposed their intellectual property in order to gain access to a market that contains 25% of the world's population. Similarly, individuals and companies alike have turned large volumes of data over to Google. This data about users and their behaviors, that used to be considered private, is Google's biggest asset.

Willing to Accept Collateral Damage

China and Google both know that the growth and change they are navigating through will be painful. China jails its dissidents, and Google has disrupted industries resulting in significant employment dislocation. The leaders of both organizations are able to maintain their focus on their plans without being distracted by the human factors. It may be unfair to equate China's human rights abuses to Google's impact on the newspaper business but the point here is that neither leadership team shows any sign of diverting from their mission because a few lives are impacted.

The Stakes are Higher for China

So far China has raised the standard of living for 500 million people to above the poverty line. The largest and fastest advancement by any nation ever. The mind numbing volume and significance of the choices the leaders of China have had to make to bring about the rise of their nation is awe inspiring. Each misstep has had very real consequences -- in extreme cases measured in the loss of life due to starvation or unrest. The ascension to power and prosperity in our own country pales in comparison. On this scale the stakes at Google really don't register at all.

Motto or not, Google is stunned when it finds us worried they will do evil things with our data. The Chinese leadership is less naieve about the way the world reacts to its policies. They step in a careful and calculated way through their priorities, and work to influence our view of them. They know we view them through the lens of our perspective and so they study us to better understand how we see the world. Someday they will address the things that bother us including piracy and human rights. Until then, we should spend more time studying China so we can pursue mutual interests and compete more effectively.

And the spying and cyber attacks...what about them? I bet the Chinese have a long way to go to catch up our our level of sophistication in these areas. The CIA and the NSA are tough acts to follow.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>